
What If?
by Randall Munroe · 2014
The xkcd creator answers reader-submitted questions like 'what if everyone on Earth aimed a laser pointer at the moon at the same time' with actual physics, actual math, and actual jokes.
Worth reading? Munroe's real skill isn't the jokes, though there are plenty. It's that he actually does the math -- pulling in real physics, biology, and engineering to answer questions that sound like bar arguments, and following the logic wherever it leads, including to genuinely alarming conclusions about, say, what happens if you try to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light. It's a browsing book, and it's one of the funniest science books written this decade.
| Full Title | What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions |
|---|---|
| Author | Randall Munroe |
| Published | 2014 |
| Publisher | Houghton Mifflin Harcourt |
| Category | Science & Nature |
| Favorite quote | “If you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light, the ball would disintegrate the batter, the umpire, the backstop, and quite a lot of the stadium.” |
The Verdict
The gimmick is easy to describe and easy to underestimate: absurd questions, real answers. What makes it work is that Munroe never takes the shortcut. He runs the actual physics on “what if you hit a baseball pitched at near light speed” and follows it to a genuinely alarming conclusion instead of stopping at a punchline.
That commitment to rigor is also why the jokes land as well as they do. The humor isn’t imposed on the science, it comes out of the science, once you actually do the math on something that sounds ridiculous.
Read it if you want science writing that’s genuinely funny without faking the calculations. Skip it if you want one continuous argument or narrative, this is a browsing book, best read a question or two at a time.
you want science made genuinely fun -- real calculations and real research applied to gloriously pointless hypotheticals
you want a book with a narrative arc or a single unifying argument -- this is a collection of standalone questions, meant to be dipped into, not read cover to cover in one sitting

Book Summary
Munroe treats absurd hypothetical questions as an excuse to actually run the numbers -- real physics, real engineering constraints, real biology -- rather than hand-waving a funny answer, which is what makes the jokes land: the humor comes from following a serious calculation to its genuinely strange logical conclusion.
Many answers reveal that our intuitions about scale are badly miscalibrated -- what seems like it should be a minor effect (a small change in a planet's rotation, a relatively modest amount of energy) turns out to be catastrophic once you actually run the physics, and vice versa.
The book's format (short, standalone questions, mostly independent of each other) mirrors Munroe's xkcd webcomic roots: it's built for browsing and rereading rather than linear consumption, and several questions loop back to explain the same underlying physics (relative velocity, orbital mechanics, thermodynamics) from a different absurd angle.
Top 8 Lessons from What If?
- Real physics can answer absurd questions rigorously -- the humor works because Munroe commits to the actual math instead of a hand-wavy punchline.
- Human intuition about physical scale is frequently wrong -- effects we assume are trivial (a small speed increase, a modest energy release) are often catastrophic once calculated properly, and vice versa.
- Orbital mechanics and relative velocity show up as the hidden physics behind an enormous range of seemingly unrelated hypothetical questions.
- Extreme scenarios (a bullet fired at absurd speed, a sudden change in Earth's rotation) are a useful teaching tool precisely because pushing a normal physical situation to its limit reveals the underlying rules more clearly than a normal-scale example would.
- Thermodynamics and energy conservation constrain even the most fantastical hypothetical scenarios -- you can't hand-wave away where the energy in a scenario has to come from or go.
- Many 'obviously impossible' scenarios are less about violating physical law and more about the sheer scale of energy or material required, which Munroe treats as its own kind of answer.
- Munroe's research process (consulting real physicists, engineers, and existing research rather than guessing) is itself a model for taking a silly question seriously without pretending it isn't silly.
- The most memorable answers usually involve a scenario that would be catastrophic for humans specifically, even when the underlying physical event itself is comparatively unremarkable on a cosmic scale.
Top 6 Quotes from What If?
"This is one of the most fun parts of my job: someone asks a ridiculous question, and I get to treat it like a legitimate research problem."
Randall Munroe, What If?
"In summary: An asteroid moving at that speed would not slow down measurably as it passed through the Earth."
Randall Munroe, What If?
"If you tried to hit a baseball pitched at 90% the speed of light, the ball would disintegrate the batter, the umpire, the backstop, and quite a lot of the stadium."
Randall Munroe, What If?
"It's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop at the end."
Randall Munroe, What If?
"Sure, we seem like we've taken over the planet, but if I had to bet on which one of us would still be around in a million years -- primates, computers, or ants -- I know who I'd pick."
Randall Munroe, What If?
"The lesson: If the optimist says the glass is half full, and the pessimist says the glass is half empty, the physicist ducks."
Randall Munroe, What If?
Frequently Asked Questions
Is What If? worth reading?
Yes -- it's one of the funniest science books available, and the jokes work because Munroe actually runs the real physics behind every absurd question.
What is What If? about?
Randall Munroe answering reader-submitted absurd hypothetical questions (like hitting a relativistic baseball, or draining the oceans) with rigorous physics, math, and research rather than hand-waved punchlines.
Do I need a science background to read What If?
No -- Munroe explains the physics in plain language as he goes, and the humor doesn't require any prior technical knowledge.
Is What If? meant to be read cover to cover?
Not necessarily -- it's a collection of mostly standalone questions, built for browsing and dipping in and out rather than a single narrative read.
How does What If? compare to Munroe's xkcd webcomic?
Same voice and comic sensibility, longer form -- the book lets Munroe go deeper into the math and research than a single comic panel allows.
Ready to read it?
Get What If? on Amazon






